<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Morning Comment on &#8220;Evolution of the Obvious&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zephyr98.com/2009/12/monday-morning-comment-on-evolution-of-the-obvious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zephyr98.com/2009/12/monday-morning-comment-on-evolution-of-the-obvious/</link>
	<description>Translated from the English</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anil Menon</title>
		<link>http://www.zephyr98.com/2009/12/monday-morning-comment-on-evolution-of-the-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Anil Menon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zephyr98.com/?p=569#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the linkback, Kurt. 

Interesting point u raise here, namely, that there&#039;s adaptive value in being alert to coincidences. If so, then the world needs to be pretty predictable and ho-hum on the whole. It&#039;d be interesting to think of how cognition would evolve on a much more random world-- say a world where events that could happen very often do happen.  On such a world, would rationality be treated as something despicable, something to be cured through a proper scientific education? 

Anil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the linkback, Kurt. </p>
<p>Interesting point u raise here, namely, that there&#8217;s adaptive value in being alert to coincidences. If so, then the world needs to be pretty predictable and ho-hum on the whole. It&#8217;d be interesting to think of how cognition would evolve on a much more random world&#8211; say a world where events that could happen very often do happen.  On such a world, would rationality be treated as something despicable, something to be cured through a proper scientific education? </p>
<p>Anil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eadwacer</title>
		<link>http://www.zephyr98.com/2009/12/monday-morning-comment-on-evolution-of-the-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Eadwacer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 23:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zephyr98.com/?p=569#comment-75</guid>
		<description>This is like the observation effect. I think that ER admits go up during a full moon. It’s a hectic night in the ER and I look outside — the moon is full. I remember that. I don’t remember all the hectic nights when the moon wasn’t full. 

Then there’s the XKCD approach. “When my brother died, I felt a pang in my heart” “Was the pang instantaneous, or was there a speed of light delay?”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is like the observation effect. I think that ER admits go up during a full moon. It’s a hectic night in the ER and I look outside — the moon is full. I remember that. I don’t remember all the hectic nights when the moon wasn’t full. </p>
<p>Then there’s the XKCD approach. “When my brother died, I felt a pang in my heart” “Was the pang instantaneous, or was there a speed of light delay?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
